Canivez, G.
L. (1998). Automated syndromic profile and discriminant classification
analyses for the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents.
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30,
732-743.
Canivez, G. L. (2001). Review of the Adjustment Scales for Children
and Adolescents. In J. Impara and B. Plake (Eds.), The fourteenth
mental measurements yearbook (pp. 22-24). Lincoln, NE: Buros
Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska.
Canivez, G. L. (2004). Replication of the Adjustment Scales for
Children and Adolescents core syndrome factor structure. Psychology
in the Schools, 41,191-199.
Canivez, G. L. (2006). Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents
and Native American Indians: Factorial validity generalization for
Ojibwe youths. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 685-694.
Canivez, G.
L., & Beran, T. N. (2009). Adjustment Scales for Children and
Adolescents: Factorial validity in a Canadian sample. Canadian
Journal of School Psychology, 24, 284-302.
Canivez, G. L., & Bohan, K. (2006). Adjustment Scales for Children
and Adolescents and Native American Indians: Factorial Validity
Generalization for Yavapai Apache Youths. Journal of Psychoeducational
Assessment,
24, 329-341.
Canivez, G. L., & Bordenkircher, S. E. (2002). Convergent and
divergent validity of the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents
for Children and the Preschool and Kindergarten Behavior Scales.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 30-45.
Canivez, G. L., Neitzel, R., & Martin, B. E. (2005). Construct
Validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Wechsler Intelligence
Scale for Children-Third Edition, and Adjustment Scales for Children
and Adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23,
15-24.
Canivez, G. L., Perry, A. R., & Weller, E. M. (2001). Stability
of the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents. Psychology
in the Schools, 38, 217-227.
Canivez, G. L., & Rains, J. D. (2002). Construct validity of
the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents and the Preschool
and Kindergarten Behavior Scales: Convergent and divergent evidence.
Psychology in the Schools, 39, 621-633.
Canivez, G. L., & Sprouls, K. (2005). Assessing the Construct
Validity of the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 3-14.
Canivez, G.
L., & Sprouls, K. (2010). Adjustment Scales for Children and
Adolescents: Factorial Validity Generalization with Hispanic/Latino
Youths. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 209-221.
Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (2002). Interrater agreement
for syndromic profile classifications on the Adjustment Scales for
Children and Adolescents. Assessment for Effective Intervention,
28, 39-46.
Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W., & Schaefer, B. A. (2002). Interrater
agreement of Discriminant Classifications for the Adjustment Scales
for Children and Adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 39,
375-384.
McDermott, P. A. (1993). National standardization of uniform multisituational
measures of child and adolescent behavior pathology. Psychological
Assessment, 5, 413-424.
McDermott, P. A. (1994). National Profiles in Youth Psychopathology:
Manual of Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents. Philadelphia,
PA: Edumetric and Clinical Science.
McDermott, P. A. (1995). Sex, race, class, and other demographics
as explanations for children's ability and adjustment: A national
appraisal. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 75-91.
McDermott, P. A. (1996). A nationwide study of developmental and
gender prevalence for psychopathology in childhood and adolescence.
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, 53-66.
McDermott, P. A., Marston, N. C., & Stott, D. H. (1993). Adjustment
Scales for Children and Adolescents. Philadelphia, PA: Edumetric
and Clinical Science.
McDermott, P. A., & Schaefer, B. A. (1996). A demographic survey
of rare and common problem behaviors among American students.
Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25, 352-362.
McDermott,
P. A., Goldberg, M. M., Watkins, M. W., Stanley, J. L., & Glutting,
J. J. (2005). A nationwide epidemiologic modeling study of learning
disabilities: Risk, protection, and unintended impact. Journal
of Learning Disabilities, 39, 230-251.
McDermott,
P. A., & Spencer, M. B. (1997). Racial and social class prevalence
of psychopathology among school-age youth in the United States.
Youth & Society, 28, 387-414.
McDermott,
P. A.,Steinberg, C. M., & Angelo, L. E. (2005). Situational
specificity makes the difference in assessment of youth behavior
disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 121-136.
McDermott,
P. A., Watkins, M. W., Sichel, A. F., Weber, E. M., Keenan, J. T.,
Holland, A. M., & Leigh, N. M. (1995). The accuracy of new national
scales for detecting emotional disturbance of children and adolescents.
Journal of Special Education, 29, 337-354.
McDermott,
P. A., & Weiss, R. V. (1993). Syndromic profile types for
the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents. Philadelphia,
PA: Edumetric and Clinical Science.
McDermott, P. A., & Weiss, R. V. (1995). A normative typology
of healthy, subclinical, and clinical behavior styles among American
children and adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 7,
162-170.
Schaefer, B. A., Watkins, M. W., & Canivez, G. L. (2001). Cross-context
agreement of the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19, 123-136.
Schowengerdt, R. V. (2001). Review of the Adjustment Scales for
Children and Adolescents. In J. Impara and B. Plake (Eds.), The
fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 24-26). Lincoln,
NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska.
Watkins, M. W., & Canivez, G. L. (1997). Interrater agreement
of the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents. Diagnostique,
22, 205-213.