CHEMISTRY
3780
INSTRUMENTAL
ANALYSIS
Fall
2007
Instructor: Jonathan
P. Blitz
Lecture: 1:00
- 1:50 MW
Laboratory: T
8-11 (Blitz) or R 8-11 (
Office: S-3450
(Phone 581-6369), jpblitz@eiu.edu
Office Hours: M
9-10 & 2-3, W 9-10 & 2-3
Texts: Principles of
Instrumental Analysis, 6th Edition (2007), Skoog/Holler/Crouch
Quantitative
Chemical Analysis, 7th Edition (2007), Harris
Writing: The ACS Style Guide, 2nd Edition, J.S. Dodd,
Editor
Lab
Manual: Website:
http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfjpb/teaching/ia/iahome.htm
If you have a documented disability, please see me and every
effort will be made to assist you in your efforts.
COURSE OVERVIEW
The course consists of a lecture and a laboratory
component. The lecture is worth 50% of
your total grade, the lab is also worth 50% of your total grade.
Chemistry 3780 has three main objectives, to: (1) familiarize you with various chemical
instruments and how they are used; (2) help you understand the advantages and
limitations of various instrumental approaches to analytical problems; and (3)
give you practice in the laboratory and in writing formal laboratory reports.
We will cover instrumental fundamentals, spectroscopic, and chromatographic
techniques. There is insufficient time
to cover electroanalytical chemistry.
This course is a “writing intensive” course. Writing quality
laboratory reports is a crucial component of this course. There is a significant increase in
expectation level in the quality of work and thought which is required to do
well in both lecture and laboratory as compared to quantitative analysis.
COURSE GRADE
The following grades are guaranteed if your overall course
score is greater than or equal to the following:
OVERALL
COURSE SCORE OVERALL COURSE GRADE
90% A
80% B
70% C
60% D
NOTES ABOUT THE LECTURE
Homework will be assigned but not graded. While there will be some numerical problems,
they are generally not particularly challenging and of the “plug and chug”
variety. Most questions, even numerical
problems, are meant to illustrate important concepts. Many questions will involve short answers
which are designed to probe your understanding of the material, as well as your
ability to synthesize that material into meaningful knowledge. (Contrast with
quantitative analysis.) Hence good writing again comes in handy even during
exam time. You will need to generate a
deep understanding of the material in order to perform well. This is not easy, and cannot be done a few
days prior to an exam. In short this is
a deceptively difficult course.
The final exam will be on Tuesday, December 11, at 12:30 PM.
NOTES ABOUT THE LABORATORY
Logistics.
You have signed up for laboratory on either Tuesday mornings
or Thursday mornings. You will be
assigned a laboratory to perform in a given week at your time. Adequate preparation, particularly in the
latter part of the semester, is absolutely vital. The first week of lab you will break up into
groups of two or three depending on the number of people in lab. Staggered starting times will be assigned so
your instructor can provide you uninterrupted attention to get you going. The choice of lab partner is very important;
it will influence how positive the laboratory experience is and how much you
learn. The choosing of lab partners
should be done with care, your instructor can assign groups if that is
preferred. Groups of 3 will be allowed
to the extent they are mathematically necessary, but such groups will be
minimized. Once these groups are set in the first week, a lab schedule will be
prepared for you so you know what to expect for the remainder of the semester.
Reports.
Each group member must submit a separate report. You will share data, make copies of spectra,
etc. You may also discuss the lab with
each other to try to figure out what is going on. Collaborations in the
laboratory write-ups is not allowed. Lab
write-ups which are strikingly similar among group and/or class members will be
treated as plagiarism. Taking or
paraphrasing large excerpts of your report from other sources is also
plagiarism. Paraphrasing or simply using
extended passages from the text, with references, may not be plagiarism in the
strictest of terms, but it is also not acceptable. The report should be in
your own writing. Plagiarism is a most serious academic integrity issue,
which will result in a failing grade not for the assignment, but for the class.
Disputes will be resolved through the Office of Academic Integrity. The issue of plagiarism in a variety of forms
has come up in this class more than once; no tolerance remains.
All laboratory reports should be turned in to your
instructor in hardcopy. In addition, an electronic version of your report will
be uploaded to www.turnitin.com. This
software will check your report against an extended database of reports and
other reference materials, reporting back with statistics related to the
possibility of plagiarized material. You must each enroll at this web site to
upload your documents. The information
you will need is the Class ID: 1997241 and Class enrollment password:
Instrumental
For some instrumental lab is the first junior or senior
level laboratory course encountered. The report requirements will be a shock to
people in this situation. In previous
courses the mechanics of performing the laboratory were stressed. The quality
of your analytical results remains important, constituting a portion of the
laboratory grade, but not to the same extent as quantitative analysis, which
was meant to teach laboratory technique.
It is important now that you not only exhibit proper laboratory
technique, but also be able to understand the concepts of the experiment, and
write a detailed report describing your work.
In other words comprehension and writing skills will be stressed, but
proper laboratory technique must not be ignored. This will not be an easy adjustment for most;
nor will this be pleasant for anyone (instructor included), but it is too important to ignore. The only way to attain the important goal of
competently conveying ideas on paper is to hold you to a reasonable standard.
Reports must be typed.
Quality is better than quantity.
Don't fill up space with unnecessary blather, your grade will
suffer. Since your report should include
an account of what happened in lab (i.e. an experimental section), you will
thank yourself for keeping a good lab notebook.
Refer to the ACS Style Guide and my web site for help in
writing your reports. You will find
Chapter 1 in the ACS Style Guide to be most useful.
Approximate Laboratory Schedule
Week
of |
Laboratory |
August 20 |
Introduction/Group
Assignments/Check-in |
August 27 |
Calibrations I:
Standard Calibration & Beer’s Law |
September 3 |
Calibrations II:
Standard Additions |
September 10 |
Calibrations III: Internal
Standards |
September 17* |
Instrument Components* |
September 24* |
Signal-to-Noise and
Trading Rules* |
October 1* |
Chromatography Basics* |
October 8 |
Projects Discussion |
October 15 |
Laboratory
Preparations I |
October 22 |
Laboratory
Preparations II |
October 29 |
Laboratory
Preparations III |
November 5 |
Pre-lab Presentations |
November 12 |
Round Robin I |
November 19 |
Round Robin II |
December 3 |
Check-out |
* Different groups will perform these three labs on
different dates on a staggered schedule to be determined.
On or by October 8 you will be given a reference from either
the Journal of Chemical Education or
the Chemical Educator which
describes, in general terms, a laboratory for Instrumental Analysis. Each group
will work out the details of these labs, and complete a write-up to be
simultaneously handed in to me and your fellow students on November 5. On this
date each group will present a pre-lab lecture of the experiment which you
completed. The final two weeks of the semester groups will perform labs that
the other groups have prepared based on the journal article assigned. These
labs will be written up and handed in the same way as the earlier labs.