CRITERIO DE EVALUACIÓN PARA LOS INFORMES

CONTENIDO Y ORGANIZACIÓN
60-54  topic well-thought-out and carefully developed with effective supporting detail; interesting to read; clear thesis; flow of ideas fluid and logical
51-42  topic may not be fully explored; development is adequate although some ideas may be incompletely supported or irrelevant; interesting ideas in places; main ideas stand out but reader may sometimes have difficulty following flow of ideas.
39-30  topic explored only superficially and inadequately developed with many ideas unsupported or irrelevant; ideas frequently confused and/or disconnected, with logical breakdowns apparent; reader frequently has difficulty “getting the point” of message as communicated
27-21  shows no awareness of reader needs; ideas superficial and/or uninteresting with little development; logical organization absent
0-21  few ideas or little information; no organization; OR not enough to evaluate
 

GRAMÁTICA
20-18  wide range of structures with few or no significant errors (e.g. sentence structure)
17-14  adequate range of structures, but little variety; tends to overuse simple constructions; both significant and minor errors (e.g. agreement) present, but meaning seldom obscured
13-10  limited range of structures with control of grammar uncertain; errors frequent, especially when more complex constructions attempted; meaning often confused or obscured
9-7  frequent and persistent errors of basic grammar and sentence construction; meaning blocked as text dominated by errors
7-0 meaning almost totally blocked OR not enough to evaluate

VOCABULARIO
20-18  language choices appropriate for topic, purpose and reader; excellent use of idioms and precise, colorful vocabulary; little or no evidence of English interference
17-14  language choices usually appropriate for topic, purpose and reader; vocabulary accurate but may be somewhat limited; some errors or interference may be present but meaning rarely obscured
13-10  language choices sometimes inappropriate for topic, purpose and reader; vocabulary very limited, with overuse of imprecise or vague terms; English interference evident, particularly with respect to idioms; meaning often confused or obscured
9-7  language choices often inappropriate for topic, purpose and reader; range of vocabulary extremely limited; English interference frequent
7-0  language choices obscure meaning beyond recognition; OR not enough to evaluate

adapted from Valdés, Guadalupe et al.  Composición: Proceso y síntesis.  3ª edición.  Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1999.